So after my last post about Denza's work and my research into diplomatic immunity, I decided to shift perspectives and look at how diplomatic immunity is used in the real world.
Using JStor, a platform I use regularly for good research articles, I was able to find an article about Britain's reaction to an abuse of diplomatic immunity and the reevaluation of their interpretations of the VCDR. It was an interesting read and an article that is from a reputable reputable concerning abuses of diplomatic immunity, that led me to an idea of my final product or my original work. Diplomatic immunity is something that is extremely necessary for diplomatic procedure and compromising immunity for a domestic political agenda can make things very tense between two states and damage relations between these two states for generations to come.
So why is this a potential Eureka moment for me? Well, this issue is actually a lot more common than I previously realised and the more I know about this problem, the more likely I can develop a solution. Now there would be considerable struggles to set this up based upon what all my other research has taught me but it is a really good starting point that could really be expounded upon. I know it is a little bit early to start thinking about my final product but it is a new point of focus for my research into diplomatic relations.